Cackle Street, Brede, Rye TN31 6EB
Owner: Pleasantly Ltd
Person in charge: Ann Barrett (Manager)
Local Authority / Social Services: East Sussex County Council (click for contact details)
Type of Service: Care Home only (Residential Care) – Privately Owned , Registered for a maximum of 35 Service Users
Registered Care Categories*: Old Age
Admission Information: Ages 65+.
Single Rooms: 33
Shared Rooms: 1
Rooms with ensuite WC: 27
Weekly Charges Guide: Personal Care Single £440 – £520 , Personal Care Shared (per person) from £395 (These prices are only a guideline, please contact Roselands to find out the exact price for your requirements.)
Facilities & Services: Respite Care • Own GP if required • Smoking not permitted • Close to Local shops • Near Public Transport • Lift • Wheelchair access • Gardens for residents • Phone Point in own room/Mobile • Television point in own room
Latest Care Quality Commission* Report on Roselands: click here
* Care Quality Commission is responsible for the registration and inspection of social care services in England.
The Review Score of 4.6 (maximum of 10) for Roselands is based on a) the Average Rating and b) the number of positive Reviews.
a) The Average Rating is 4.6 out of 5 from 1 Reviews over all time. This Average Rating is also the rating value for Roselands in Google's Search Results - more info
b) The score for the number of positive Reviews is 0 out of 5 from 0 positive Reviews in the last 12 months.
a) 5 Points are available for the Average Rating of all Reviews over all time. For each review the Care Home / service is rated Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Poor or Very Poor on a number of areas eg Staff, Management etc. The Care Home receives points for each rating as follows: Excellent = 5. Good = 4. Satisfactory = 3. Poor = 2. Very Poor = 1. These points are added up and then divided by the total number of completed ratings to generate the average rating.
The Average Rating of 4.583 for Roselands is calculated as follows: ( (7 Excellents x 5) + (5 Goods x 4) ) ÷ 12 Ratings = 4.583
b) 5 Points are available for the number of Positive Reviews in the last 12 months. If there are no Positive Reviews in the last 12 months, then 2.5 points are available for the number of Positive Reviews in the last 2 years. A Positive Review is defined as any Review with 'Extremely Likely' or 'Likely' in answer to the question 'How likely are you to recommend this Care Home to friends and family if they needed similar care or treatment?'
The 5 points available are broken down as follows:
4 points are available for the first 5 Positive Reviews, 3 points for the first Positive Review and then 0.25 Points for each of the next 4 Positive Reviews.
1 point is available for reaching a target number of Positive Reviews based on 20% of the number of registered maximum number of service users. If the target is partially reached then that proportion of 1 point is given. eg a Care Home with 50 registered maximum number of service users has a target of 10 Positive Reviews, if it has 10 or more Positive Reviews it will receive 1 point, if it has 7 reviews will receive 0.7 points.
If there are no Positive Reviews in the last 12 months, then 2.5 points are available for the number of Positive Reviews in the last 2 years. The calculation is the same as above, except the points are divided by 2.
The 0 Points relating to the number of positive Reviews for Roselands is based on 0 positive Reviews in the last 24 months and is calculated as follows:
0 = 0
Target of 7 positive Reviews (35 registered maximum number of service users ÷ 5). 0 Reviews ÷ 7 Target = 0
When a Review is submitted by someone who has previously submitted a Review, only the latest Review will count towards the Review Score.
Roselands has a Review Score of 4.6 (4.583) from 1 Reviews
Review submitted from a Postal Card by Beryl G (Daughter of Resident) on Monday 15 February 2016. Relates to February 2016.
The manageress and staff were so caring to my mother, they were constantly kind and patient with her.
How likely would you be to recommend Roselands? Extremely Likely